Bolt.new vs Codeium (Windsurf)
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, features, ratings, and best use cases. Find out which tool fits your workflow.
| โ | Bolt.new โ | Codeium (Windsurf) โ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Code & Development | Code & Development |
| Pricing | Free / $25/mo Pro / $100/mo Pro 100 / $30/user Team | Free / $15/mo Pro / $30/user Teams / $60/user Enterprise |
| Rating | โ โ โ โ โ | โ โ โ โ โ |
| Best For | Bolt.new excels at rapid prototyping and experimentation. Developers who want instant feedback without setting up local ... | Codeium/Windsurf is ideal for developers who want a full AI-powered IDE with the best free tier in the market. Best for:... |
Bolt.new
The only AI app builder that runs entirely in the browser via WebContainers โ zero setup, instant preview, Node.js runs natively. Fastest prompt-to-prototype in the industry.
โ
โ
โ
โ
โFree
Codeium (Windsurf)
The most generous free tier in AI coding โ unlimited tab autocomplete at $0. The SWE-1.5 proprietary model delivers 13x faster inference than Claude Sonnet 4.5 for latency-sensitive workflows.
โ
โ
โ
โ
โFree
Feature Tags
Shared:coding
Bolt.new only:full-stackprototypingno-codebrowser-ide
Codeium (Windsurf) only:idedeveloperautocompleteagent
Bolt.new โ
Pros
- + Fastest prompt-to-prototype โ no setup, instant preview
- + Predictable token-based pricing with 1-month rollover
- + Open-source engine โ can self-host or customize
Cons
- โ Backend limited to Node.js/Express (no Python, Go, etc.)
- โ UI output less polished than Lovable for consumer-facing apps
- โ No built-in mobile app support
Codeium (Windsurf) โ
Pros
- + Unlimited tab autocomplete on free tier โ best among AI coding tools
- + SWE-1.5 model is exceptionally fast (13ร Sonnet 4.5)
- + Cascade agent handles complex multi-file refactoring
Cons
- โ Windsurf branding confusion โ formerly Codeium, acquired by Cognition
- โ Smaller community and fewer integrations than Cursor or Copilot
- โ Cascade agent can be less reliable than Cursor's Agent on complex tasks
More Comparisons
Want more detail? Read our in-depth reviews: